Saturday, February 26, 2011

Bisphenol A - Political Hell Freezes Over


 

(SALEM, Ore.) - On January 16th, 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration finally hopped ship in a last ditch effort to save what’s left of their plastic boat. It was hardly a rush to reckless abandonment in the wake of mounting toxic bisphenol glaciers shining brightly as beacons in the night.

Both the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health and the FDA announced they “have some concern about the potential effects of bisphenol A on the brain, behavior, and prostate gland in fetuses, infants, and young children."


Bisphenol A (BPA) is an industrial chemical that has been present in many hard plastic bottles and aluminum food and beverage cans since the 1960's (FDA). What they are not telling you is that BPA is also a synthetic estrogen and notable endocrine disrupter.


As the boiling pot of controversy has mounted, so have the growing cries of our scientific community outside their handful of economically influenced lackeys.


Log onto ourstolenfuture.org to view the following notable scientific studies:


Experiments with mice show that exposure during pregnancy to very low doses of bisphenol A scrambles the chromosomes of their daughters' fertilized embryos, ie., the pregnant females' grandchildren.


Experiments with rats demonstrate that low level exposure to bisphenol A during fetal growth causes breast cancer in adults.


Thirty-eight of the world's leading scientific experts on bisphenol A have warned policy-makers of potential adverse health effects of exposure to the widespread molecule used to make plastics and food can lining.
Low level BPA exposure stimulates rapid reproduction of breast cancer cells.Watch it happen: youtube.com/watch?v=N3_cYZKksvI


Slowly, our FDA has been backed into a corner of admission and submission. The mountains of substantiated evidence of BPA’s adverse health affects can no longer be ignored behind self serving lobbyist dollars and political shanties.


A group of chemical manufacturers, toy makers and retailers sued the city of San Francisco after the city’s Board of Supervisors unanimously adopted a 2006 ordinance prohibiting the sale, distribution and manufacturing of children’s products containing BPA, along with other dangerous chemicals.


Other plaintiffs were the American Chemistry Council, California Retailers Association, California Grocers Association and Juvenile Products Manufacturers Association. Corporate dollars once again took precedence over public health.


Approximately 7-8 billion pounds of BPA are produced annually. BPA can be found in almost all Americans. FDA released estimates saying they suspect 100 percent of Americans are exposed due to vast use of BPA plastics in everything from coating for children's teeth to prevent cavities, metal food can liners, plastic food containers, baby bottles, water bottles, juice, milk and water containers, microwave “safe” ovenware and eating utensils and much, much more. Revenue from BPA based products is estimated to be over $700,000 per hour*. It’s your money and your life.


Note what FDA did not say. They did not make any statement to suggest any exercise of federal power over manufacturers or distributors by way of a ban. They simply made a cautionary announcement to inform the public of this “concern”.

Can we agree that it will take years, if not generations to clear the product base from the store shelves and warehouses? Note the lack of FDA effort to make an official stance where it counts. They’ve been aware of the scientific data for decades. They are giving manufacturers ample opportunity to move their toxic product, while they spend countless more years and public funds to research and attempt to invalidate what they already know to be true.


The poisoning of Americans has become evident and justified through free choice and free flow of the almighty dollar. Business has become blind to the needs of the consumer; we no longer have a face, nor their respect.


Your dollar is their power. Your knowledge is your defense. Every time you make a purchase you cast a vote.Think about it. Are you going to assist them in moving their toxic products during the government stall to meaningful legislation?

Cancer is a corporate by-product. I’m tired of hearing people say it. I can always predict by the look on their face… “Oh well, everything gives you cancer.” It’s the corporate cop-out. That’s what they want you to say.


Your purchases prove that they can sell you anything. They know you don’t care where your food comes from. They know that you don’t want to know. Just feed me. It’s the epoch of instant gratification.


For those of you who haven’t surrendered yourselves to such atrocities, there are some viable alternatives like:
  • Get rid of all of your plastic containers, especially containers imprinted with the recycling number 7, as many of those contain BPA. You can put them to good use storing non-food items. Replace your plastic with clear glass. Made in the USA glass is safest due to lead, mercury and cadmium contaminates found in some foreign glass. There are several 
    BPA free options available in stores if you must harbor plastic. Look for the label “BPA Free”.
  • Stop heating plastic in the microwave! I see this at work all day long. The BPA leaches into your food. Use glassware whenever possible.
  • Stop eating out of cans, at least until manufacturers get the picture that they’re not allowed to poison their customers. You can help by contacting them and voicing your concerns about BPA in their products. Your favorite products have a phone number on the label. Call them. Tell them it’s only 2 cents more (we’ll pay four!) to manufacture non-BPA canned products according to Eden Foods who marketed the first canned foods without BPA. The exception to this is tomato sauce. Tomato based products emit the highest levels of BPA due to their acidic nature. Manufacturers have yet to utilize BPA-free packaging of canned tomato-based products. I purchase all of my tomato and marinara sauces in glass jars. Depending on the type, you can spice it up to create any of your favorite red sauce dishes.
  •  Love your kids. Pack their lunch. Remember, most school lunches come in cans.
    At first, yes, there will be some resistance for you and for them, but you will quickly recognize behavioral and physical improvements in your children when you begin
    to cleanse their diet of chemical toxins. It’s worth the time!
  •  Be sure your child’s plastic toys, especially infant toys say “BPA Free” on the label. Again, the FDA has some concerns about bisphenol A’s affects the brain, behavior, and prostate gland in fetuses,infants, and young children.


As recent as 2008 the FDA claimed BPA was safe, but gave consumers tips on how to reduce exposure. The FDA panel's unbiased opinions were called into question when reports surfaced in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that the head of the panel took a $5 million donation from a manufacturer who maintains BPA is safe.


The FDA’s credibility has no validity, as they have seemingly accepted a myriad of corporate bribes by allowing food manufacturers and chemical companies to corner the market on the poisoning of America. It is a false sense of security to place trust in government regulation to protect your health. The FDA appears to serve the corporate dollar even as the Titanic is sinking. Their recent jump into the lifeboat of admission only reveals how dire the situation must be.
* ourstolenfuture.org/Commentary/JPM/2010/2010-0117fdaonbpa.html

America the Munchausen Mama


April Scott Salem-News.com
See the complete article with reference links and an audio version at: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june072010/munchausen-mama-as.php


(SALEM, Ore.) - The most important job in the world is being a mother. There is nothing more satisfying that raising a child, knowing that even though you’ve made mistakes, overall you did your best. You loved them, guided them and nurtured them into well adjusted adults. 

It’s the job of a mother and I wouldn’t trade it for all the money in the world. I wouldn’t neglect that responsibility, put her safety in jeopardy or provide any sort of misguidance in sabotage of her development. I would never purposely lie to her or hurt her. You couldn’t pay me enough money. I would go to any extent to protect her, because that’s what a mama does for her children. It never changes, regardless of their age. At least that is the way it’s supposed to be.


I’ve learned in life, nothing is the way it’s supposed to be, nor is it what it seems.  It is foolish to believe that the world works that way. There are too many elements and control factors going on behind the scenes that we can’t possible have anything, but a limited concept of reality.

A child is a product of their environment. We become what we consume, both nutritionally and intellectually. We are a collective manifestation of our consumption habits. You’ve heard it before, you are what you eat. If Garbage in, then garbage out. 

We are so busy and intentionally distracted keeping pace and surviving that we don’t take the time to reflect on the details, the ingredients, the ingredients that make up our food, as well as our daily lives.

Within the barrage of media stimulation we forget to think and act for ourselves. The line blurs and dulls the natural inclination to protect ourselves from harm.


Powerful, unseen forces are at work within the American food industry that are far beyond our control or conceptualization as individuals. We are nearly powerless to define it, much less confront it, lest we become overwhelmed and overtaken by the mere strength and convolution of it all. 

It’s kind of how a child feels when it knows that it must submit to an excessively authoritarian parent. The best survival tactic, they soon learn, is to shut up and smile. Eventually they become complacent and unaware of just how entangled they are in the delusion of safety and false reality.

We, like our children, are in absolute danger of responding through the hand of complacency. America, like a mother, is accountable to the entire world through our righteous indignation in pursuit of global superiority. 


Taking into account this inherent responsibility, I falsely imagined this concept would be diligently safeguarded by all means. America has fallen short of expectations with regard to the length it will go to possess the almighty dollar in sacrifice of life and liberty of each and everyone of it’s citizen, and all of that pass by mother liberty for safe harbor.

America feeds the world and in a sense, she is the global mother. Until recently, she bore a proud past of agriculture and innovation, coupled with an absolute determination to build something great, something lasting.

We have entrusted our safety to those that have other interests at heart. Profit is the heart of American industry, without concern for its casualties.

Corporations are legally bound to their shareholders to attain the largest profits possible. That means they are continually looking for ways to cut corners, using the cheapest ingredients available. Buyer beware doesn’t even begin to cover it. The food industry is a prime example of putting profit before humanity. 


Money is not more important than human life, not more important than the life of a child. You can call me naïve, you could say I don’t have any concept of the big picture. Sacrifices have to be made for the greater good. What is the greater good, if not in the best interest of our children?

The modern American child has no real notion of nutrition, much less a majority of adults. I thought I knew. I thought the fact that I was feeding her a well balanced diet, containing something from the fruit and veggie group, meat group, grain and dairy group meant I had it covered. 

Sure, I read labels. I paid attention to salt and sugar content, fat content, and of course vitamins and minerals. Trans fats were avoided and calories were observed. Like most Americans, I didn’t really read the ingredients, I didn’t know how to pronounce them, I figured they knew what they were doing. I trusted they wouldn’t put anything in there they wouldn’t eat themselves or feed their own families. 

A mother who slowly poisons her child by adding minor amounts of chemicals to his/her food over a period of time is diagnosed with Munchausen syndrome. She is motivated by attention and America by the money. Think I’m reaching? Lets illustrate.

Bleached and Enriched Flour
In Modern Bread, The Broken Staff of Life, Dr. Elmer Cranton M.D., graduate of Harvard Medical School, exposed the flour bleaching process. He explains that flour is treated with a “chemical bleach, similar to Clorox to make bread a brighter white”. “The bleaching process leaves residues of toxic chlorinated hydrocarbons and dioxins.” “That toxic residue causes nervousness and seizures in animals.” His article points out that experiments reported in a major British medical journal, The Lancet, showed that “dogs fed exclusively on white bread died of malnutrition within two months. Dogs similarly fed only bread made with stone-ground, whole-wheat flour lived indefinitely in good health“.

Dr. Cranton says that when grain is made into refined white flour, more than 30 essential nutrients are largely removed. Only four nutrients are added back in a process called "enrichment." He says, “using this same logic, if a person were robbed of 30 dollars and the thief then returned 4 dollars to his victim for cab fare home, then that person should be considered "enriched" by 4 dollars, not robbed of 26 dollars.”

In addition, Dr. Cranston reports that only vitamins B1, B2, B3, and the iron are added back. Nutrients which are removed and not returned, include 44% of the vitamin E, 52% of the pantothenic acid, 65% of the folic acid, 76% of the biotin, 84% of the vitamin B6, and half or more of 20 minerals and trace elements, including magnesium, calcium, zinc, chromium, manganese, selenium, vanadium, and copper. [1]

If you dig deeper you’ll find that Alloxan is one of the main active ingredients used in the flour bleaching process. Scientists have known for years that alloxan causes diabetes; in fact, they feed in to lab animals to give them diabetes in order to test the drug.  How does alloxan cause diabetes? Dr. Hari Sharma's Freedom from Disease, explains how alloxan causes diabetes. “The uric acid derivative initiates free radical damage to DNA in the beta cells of the pancreas causing the cells to malfunction and die.”[2]

Bisphenol A
On January 16th, 2010 both the National Toxicology Program at the National Institutes of Health and the FDA announced they “have some concern about the potential effects of Bisphenol A on the brain, behavior, and prostate gland in fetuses, infants, and young children.” 

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an industrial chemical that has been present in many hard plastic bottles and aluminum food and beverage cans since the 1960’s. BPA is also a synthetic estrogen and notable endocrine disrupter. That’s right, gentlemen. Tell me how do you feel about being force fed female sex hormones? It’s in all of your canned food products at varying levels, with the limited exception of Eden Foods and few other obscure brands. 

Dr. Fred Vom Saal, Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, released a study reporting that BPA exposure alters the way your cells function at extremely low exposure levels. It damages the male reproductive system, causes brain damage, prostrate cancer and breast cancer.He measured BPA levels in several popular canned food products including tuna, tomato sauce and peas. Food was removed and the cans were filled with ultra purified water and allowed to sit for 24 hours. The ‘canned’ water was then added to human breast cancer cells causing rapid cell reproduction.[2] (watch video below)

Lisa Frack, a concerned mother, testified in favor of SB 1032 before of the Oregon State Senate. It would have phased out BPA from all reusable food and beverage containers intended for children under 3, including baby bottles and sippy cups. BPA from formula cans and baby food jars would have also been phased out.

Lisa’s testimony reminded us that the FDA assigned the very same level of concern to fetal exposure to amphetamines as they have to Bisphenol A”. The Oregon Legislature did not pass Senate Bill 1032 .Revenue from BPA based products is estimated to be over $700,000 per hour. [5]
Money, money, money...

High Fructose Corn Syrup
Mercury is used to separate the corn from the corn starch to make High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS).

In January 2009, The Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy released a study finding 50 percent of tested popular food products were positive for mercury contamination from HFCS, according to a study in the scientific journal, Environmental Health.

A separate study was also issued earlier by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) detecting mercury in nearly one-third of 55 popular brand name products. They looked at food and beverage products where High Fructose Corn Syrup is the first or second highest labeled ingredient—including products by Quaker, Hershey’s, Kraft and Smucker’s. [6]

High fructose corn syrup is used as a sweetener in beverages and foods such as breads, cereals, breakfast bars, lunch meats, yogurts, soups and condiments. On average, it is estimated that Americans consume about 45 pounds of high-fructose corn syrup per year.

"Mercury is toxic in all its forms. Given how much high-fructose corn syrup is consumed by children, it could be a significant additional source of mercury never before considered.”
[7]

Seventeen of the fifty-five products tested contained more than detectable levels of mercury.

Those products were:
Quaker Oatmeal to Go bars Jack Daniel's Barbecue Sauce, Hershey's Chocolate Syrup, Kraft Original Barbecue Sauce, Nutri-Grain Strawberry Cereal Bars, Manwich Gold Sloppy Joe, Market Pantry Grape Jelly, Smucker's Strawberry Jelly Pop-Tarts Frosted Blueberry, Hunt's Tomato Ketchup, Wish-Bone Western Sweet & Smooth Dressing, Coca-Cola Classic: (no mercury found on a second test) Yoplait Strawberry Yogurt, Minute Maid Berry Punch, Yoo-hoo Chocolate Drink, Nesquik Chocolate Milk and Kemps Fat Free Chocolate Milk

Genetically Modified Foods
An estimated 75 to 80 percent of our processed foods contain some form of genetically modified (GM) ingredients. Many GMs are in the form of  inorganic sugar, corn and soy.

Organic standards prohibit GMO contamination.Many consumers don’t understand the process used to develop genetically modified crops.  It involves a careful re-configuration of genes combining e-coli bacteria, soil bacteria and in many cases the cauliflower mosaic virus that causes tumors in plants. They add an antibiotic gene and then artificially force the new genetic combination into plant cells using several gene invasion techniques.[9] (watch video below)

The cells of the bacteria and virus combine and invade the cells of the plant to the point that our food can now be referred to as transgenic.

The seeds are designed to be Round Up Ready and now the same company that produces the pesticide, also produces the seed. Some crops even produce their own insecticide, in fact, bt corn, produces a bacterial toxin. The corn itself is actually registered as an insecticide.

In the documentary ‘Seeds of Deception’ we see then Vice President George Bush Sr. on a field trip to the Monsanto plant. Earnestly, he splices a few genes and then, Monsanto executives complain about difficulties getting around FDA regulation, so Bush advises them to call him because “we’re in the de-reg business”. [9]

Later George becomes president and we see his Vice President, Dan Quayle announcing that there would be no regulation of Genetically Modified Foods outside the normal over-site received by other products.

FDA scientists were outraged, pointing out the lack of testing and serious health effects reported in lab animals. So George hired Monsanto’s Sr. Attorney and created a position for him within the FDA.

Now GMs are categorized as “Generally Recognized As Safe” and “substantially equivalent to other foods”, so they require no testing or labeling.

Animal studies reported that GM foods caused stunted growth, impaired immune systems, bleeding stomachs, abnormal and potentially pre-cancerous cell growth in the intestines, impaired blood cell development, misshaped cell structures in the liver, pancreas and testicles, altered gene expression and cell metabolism, liver and kidney lesions, partially atrophied livers, inflamed kidneys, less developed organs, reduced digestive enzymes, higher blood sugar, inflamed lung tissue, increased death rates and higher offspring mortality as well.[10]

Twenty-five countries require labeling of GM food. The ‘GE Right To Know Act’ has yet to decided upon by Congress. [11]
Transparency, hope and change somehow escaped Obama’s mind in support of a worldwide ban on the labeling of GMs.  In February, he appointed Islam Diddiqui (former Monsanto lobbyist) as chief agricultural negotiator.

Now, USDA and FDA released a position paper opposing labeling for genetically modified food. The U.S. claims that letting consumers know whether or not GM/GE products are contained in food is “false, misleading, or deceptive.”

Have our regulatory agencies sold us out to corporate America, allowing them to experiment on us and our children and the entire planet via our food?

I see it worse than a bad plotted science fiction movie, that appears to be slowing destroying all real creation with little drops of poison and mutant organisms. But maybe I’ve watched too much T.V.

Nevertheless, organic food is looking better than ever. Cost and all. By all means, considering all of this is just a drop in the bucket, if we as a nation continue to feed our children like we do,  might we conclude Munchausen syndrome?

See the complete article with reference links and an audio version at: http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june072010/munchausen-mama-as.php

See the Non- GMO Shopping Guide - from Center For Food Safety and The Institute for Responsible Technology http://www.nongmoshoppingguide.com.

References:
[1] Dr. Elmer Cranton - Modern Bread, The Broken Staff of Life
http://www.drcranton.com/nutrition/bread.htm
[4] Dr. Fred Vom Saal, Professor of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri on Fox News Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3_cYZKksvI
[5] Bisphenol A - Political Hell Freezes Over - April Scott  http://www.salem-news.com/articles/january272010/bisphenol_as.php

Saturday, February 19, 2011

US One of Top Five Food Safety Violators

Salem-News.com (Mar-14-2010 23:34) 
April Scott Salem-News.com
Findings based on contamination levels collected between 2003 and 2008 identified China as the number one food safety threat.
(LONDON / SALEM) - A new global monitoring tool identifies the United States as one of the top five worst food safety offenders in the world. We take rank with China, Turkey, Iran, and Spain.
This extensive integrated network was designed by Kingston University researchers to offer an instant snapshot of the state of food safety around the world.
The rankings were established through electronic tracking of countries that issue the most food safety alerts and those that produce the greatest number of faulty or contaminated foods.
Findings based on contamination levels collected between 2003 and 2008 identified China as the number one food safety threat.
The comprehensive system was unveiled in February at a meeting of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).
All countries collectively issue tens of thousands of food alerts each year, say the developers. This creates an urgent need to filter the enormous body of information to highlight where to place concentrated efforts. They reported that the program would help countries identify food safety transgressors and process a high volume of recall data.
"With increased international trade, the right of the citizen to an adequate diet emphasizes the importance of coherent government responses to food safety and security", reports say.
The interactive tool allows users to quickly access global food safety information with a wide range of report patterns. Graphs allow users to see food safety patterns and compare them to those of other countries.
Professor Declan Naughton, one of the system's developers, told Medical News that the new program is unrivaled in its ability to analyze food safety data. "No other system can reflect the complexity of this information in a snapshot form," he said. "It can be particularly helpful to developing countries new to food testing because information is easy to access and available in minutes."
Researchers say they recognized a growing need for the program because of wide variations in food safety monitoring in developed and undeveloped countries. The site explains that weekly food alerts and recalls can provide vital information for immediate response.
The system generates comprehensive information to assess long-term patterns and trends that can help countries formulate plans of action.
Naughton believes the model could have even broader applications. "We'd like to develop the tool to create an international alert system that will provide real time information about emerging patterns and problems."
Developers report that their system was developed to aid the Beijing Declaration on food safety and security that was signed by over fifty countries to help build a comprehensive program for monitoring food safety and security on behalf of their citizens.
The tool is available online at: Food alert networks staffnet.kingston.ac.uk
Full Report: Network Analytical Tool for Monitoring Global Food Safety Highlights China
Sources: Nepusz T, Petróczi A, Naughton DP: Network analytical tool for monitoring global food safety highlights China. PLoS ONE 4(8):e6680, 2009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006680.

GM Food... Feeding the Hungry or Population Control?

Salem-News.com (Apr-26-2010 23:48)
April Scott Salem-News.com
Around 75% percent of our processed foods contain some form of genetically modified ingredients.
(SALEM, Ore.) - Today Salem-News reports that a joint experiment by Russia’s National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems has revealed that hamsters fed genetically modified (GM) foods produce grandchildren that are unable to produce fourth generation offspring.
Scientist Alexei Surov described the experiment, in which they monitored the behavior, weight gain and birthrate of several groups of hamsters. Upon birth of the second generation they noted slower rates of growth and sexual maturity. The next generation was unable to produce[1].
Genetically modified foods will feed the hungry. I guess that’s one way of putting it.
You could also call it population control. Technically, the final result would be an end to world hunger. They didn’t lie. Who are they? Please refer to my Salem-News story “While We Were Sleeping...GM Food and the Brink of No Return”.[2]
Russian scientists are not the only ones that have warned of noted health effects caused by genetically modified foods. Let us not forget that the scientists that were fired after they discovered serious health effects in animals after feeding them GM food products.
Believing in the potential of GM foods, UC Berkeley's Ignacio Chapela and Arpad Pusztai, a plant genetic modification expert from Scotland Rowett Research Institute, were commissioned to conduct the first independent study on animals fed GM foods.
Studies showed stunted growth, impaired immune systems, bleeding stomachs, abnormal and potentially pre-cancerous cell growth in the intestines, impaired blood cell development, misshaped cell structures in the liver, pancreas and testicles, altered gene expression and cell metabolism, liver and kidney lesions, partially atrophied livers, inflamed kidneys, less developed organs, reduced digestive enzymes, higher blood sugar, inflamed lung tissue, increased death rates and higher offspring mortality as well[3].
On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear its first arguments regarding genetically modified alfalfa. This decision will set precedents for future laws and regulations with regard to growing all GM foodstuff..
The world is watching as Monsanto and the U.S Government promote the growth and continued expansion of their genetic modification program. They have patented the pig, the salmon and other species and genetically engineered their genes to produce offspring with more meat.
An estimated seventy-five percent of our processed foods contain some form of genetically modified (GM) ingredients. Are we willing as a nation to risk the lives of our future children and grandchildren to discover that these effects are only observed in animals? How likely is it that we will be experiencing these same effects on a personal level as we consume more genetically modified organisms against our will?
I’ll say it again, are they attempting to feed the world or is it population control? I guarantee that Monsanto and the FDA can answer that. I also guarantee that we will all know the result of this experiment very soon.
Here is the Voice of Russia report from Moscow:
Russia has started the annual Days of Defense against Environmental Hazards from the 15th of April to the 5th of June with the announcement of sensational results of an independent work of research.
Scientists have proven that Genetically Modified Organisms are harmful for mammals. The researchers discovered that animals that eat GM foodstuffs lose their ability to reproduce.
Campbell hamsters that have a fast reproduction rate were fed for two years with ordinary soya beans, which are widely used in agriculture and contain different percentages of GM organisms. Another group of hamsters, the control group, was fed with pure soya, which was found with great difficulty in Serbia because 95 percent of soya in the world is transgenic.
Concerning the experiment carried out jointly by the National Association for Gene Security and the Institute of Ecological and Evolutional Problems, Dr. Alexei Surov had this to say.
“We selected several groups of hamsters, kept them in pairs in cells and gave them ordinary food as always,” says Alexei Surov.
“We did not add anything for one group but the other was fed with soya that contained no GM components, while the third group with some content of Genetically Modified Organisms and the fourth one with increased amount of GMO. We monitored their behavior and how they gain weight and when they give birth to their cubs. Originally, everything went smoothly. However, we noticed quite a serious effect when we selected new pairs from their cubs and continued to feed them as before. These pairs’ growth rate was slower and they reached their sexual maturity more slowly. When we got some of their cubs we formed the new pairs of the third generation. We failed to get cubs from these pairs, which were fed with GM foodstuffs. It was proved that these pairs lost their ability to give birth to their cubs,” Dr. Alexei Surov said.
Another surprise was discovered by scientists in hamsters of the third generation. Hair grew in the mouth of the animals that took part in the experiment. It’s unclear why this happened.
The researchers cannot understand why a programme of destruction is launched when animals take GMO foodstuffs. They say that this can be neutralized only by ceasing to use these foods.
Consequently, scientists suggest imposing a ban on the use of GM foods until they are tested for their bio-security. The results of Russian scientists coincide with those of their colleagues from France and Austria. For one, when scientist proved that GM maize was harmful to mammals, France immediately banned its production and sale.
The scientists who carried out the experiment say that it’s too early to make far-reaching conclusions about the health hazards of GMO. They insist that there is a need to carry out comprehensive research.
They suggest implementing the project, “Safety Gene Technology” at the innovation centre, “Skolkovo” which is being set up near Moscow.[1] Russia Says Genetically Modified Foods are Harmful - Salem-News.com[2] While We Were Sleeping... GM Food and the Brink of No Return - April Scott Salem-News.com[3] "Seeds of Destruction, The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation" Review of F. William Engdahl's Book

Researcher: Glyphosate (Roundup) or Roundup Ready Crops May Cause Animal Miscarriages

Salem-News.com (Feb-19-2011 11:45)

(PURDUE) - A bombshell has been quietly dropped on the website of the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance. I should disclose, upfront, that the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance (FARFA) is founded and run by my close friend Judith McGeary.
Said bombshell is an open letter written by Dr. Don Huber, professor emeritus at Purdue University, to Tom Vilsack, presenting a finding of a correlation between either glyphosate or Roundup Ready crops and a new, previously unknown organism that may be the cause of animal miscarriages and infertility.
As the letter, printed below, notes, this research is still preliminary. However, Huber, who has 40 years experience working as a scientist for "professional and military agencies that evaluate and prepare for natural and manmade biological threats, including germ warfare and disease outbreaks," believes this should be treated as an emergency until more research can confirm or disprove these initial findings.
Needless to say, the recent deregulation of GE alfalfa is something to think about, because that will dramatically increase the use of Roundup on animal feed and the feeding of Roundup Ready crops to our livestock. There is more to be said on this, but I want to tread carefully and stick to facts that I can confirm, so stay tuned.
Jill Richardson :: Researcher: Glyphosate (Roundup) or Roundup Ready Crops May Cause Animal Miscarriages
Dear Secretary Vilsack:
A team of senior plant and animal scientists have recently brought to my attention the discovery of an electron microscopic pathogen that appears to significantly impact the health of plants, animals, and probably human beings. Based on a review of the data, it is widespread, very serious, and is in much higher concentrations in Roundup Ready (RR) soybeans and corn-suggesting a link with the RR gene or more likely the presence of Roundup.  This organism appears NEW to science!
This is highly sensitive information that could result in a collapse of US soy and corn export markets and significant disruption of domestic food and feed supplies. On the other hand, this new organism may already be responsible for significant harm (see below). My colleagues and I are therefore moving our investigation forward with speed and discretion, and seek assistance from the USDA and other entities to identify the pathogen's source, prevalence, implications, and remedies.
We are informing the USDA of our findings at this early stage, specifically due to your pending decision regarding approval of RR alfalfa. Naturally, if either the RR gene or Roundup itself is a promoter or co-factor of this pathogen, then such approval could be a calamity. Based on the current evidence, the only reasonable action at this time would be to delay deregulation at least until sufficient data has exonerated the RR system, if it does.
For the past 40 years, I have been a scientist in the professional and military agencies that evaluate and prepare for natural and manmade biological threats, including germ warfare and disease outbreaks. Based on this experience, I believe the threat we are facing from this pathogen is unique and of a high risk status. In layman's terms, it should be treated as an emergency.
A diverse set of researchers working on this problem have contributed various pieces of the puzzle, which together presents the following disturbing scenario:
Unique Physical Properties
This previously unknown organism is only visible under an electron microscope (36,000X), with an approximate size range equal to a medium size virus. It is able to reproduce and appears to be a micro-fungal-like organism. If so, it would be the first such micro-fungus ever identified. There is strong evidence that this infectious agent promotes diseases of both plants and mammals, which is very rare.
Pathogen Location and Concentration
It is found in high concentrations in Roundup Ready soybean meal and corn, distillers meal, fermentation feed products, pig stomach contents, and pig and cattle placentas.
Linked with Outbreaks of Plant Disease
The organism is prolific in plants infected with two pervasive diseases that are driving down yields and farmer income-sudden death syndrome (SDS) in soy, and Goss' wilt in corn. The pathogen is also found in the fungal causative agent of SDS (Fusarium solani fsp glycines).
Implicated in Animal Reproductive Failure
Laboratory tests have confirmed the presence of this organism in a wide variety of livestock that have experienced spontaneous abortions and infertility. Preliminary results from ongoing research have also been able to reproduce abortions in a clinical setting.
The pathogen may explain the escalating frequency of infertility and spontaneous abortions over the past few years in US cattle, dairy, swine, and horse operations. These include recent reports of infertility rates in dairy heifers of over 20%, and spontaneous abortions in cattle as high as 45%.
For example, 450 of 1,000 pregnant heifers fed wheatlege experienced spontaneous abortions. Over the same period, another 1,000 heifers from the same herd that were raised on hay had no abortions. High concentrations of the pathogen were confirmed on the wheatlege, which likely had been under weed management using glyphosate.
Recommendations
In summary, because of the high titer of this new animal pathogen in Roundup Ready crops, and its association with plant and animal diseases that are reaching epidemic proportions, we request USDA's participation in a multi-agency investigation, and an immediate moratorium on the deregulation of RR crops until the causal/predisposing relationship with glyphosate and/or RR plants can be ruled out as a threat to crop and animal production and human health.
It is urgent to examine whether the side-effects of glyphosate use may have facilitated the growth of this pathogen, or allowed it to cause greater harm to weakened plant and animal hosts. It is well-documented that glyphosate promotes soil pathogens and is already implicated with the increase of more than 40 plant diseases; it dismantles plant defenses by chelating vital nutrients; and it reduces the bioavailability of nutrients in feed, which in turn can cause animal disorders. To properly evaluate these factors, we request access to the relevant USDA data.
I have studied plant pathogens for more than 50 years. We are now seeing an unprecedented trend of increasing plant and animal diseases and disorders. This pathogen may be instrumental to understanding and solving this problem. It deserves immediate attention with significant resources to avoid a general collapse of our critical agricultural infrastructure.
Sincerely,
COL (Ret.) Don M. Huber
Emeritus Professor, Purdue University
APS Coordinator, USDA National Plant Disease Recovery System (NPDRS)
Researcher: Glyphosate (Roundup) or Roundup Ready Crops May Cause Animal Miscarriages
Salem-News.com